The Legal Advantages of Blockchain Technology For Notary Protocol Archives

Authors

  • Widya Kridawidyani Pelita Harapan University, Jakarta - Indonesia
  • Yuni Priskila Ginting Pelita Harapan University, Jakarta - Indonesia
  • Fajar Sugianto Pelita Harapan University, Jakarta - Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30872/mulrev.v8i2.1049

Keywords:

Blockchain Technology, Notary Protocol, Archive

Abstract

The rapid progress of the development of information technology has made many changes in human life on this earth. Work and activities that used to be done manually are now shifting to using a technological approach. So far, notary services to the public are still conventional, but with the development of information technology, notary services inevitably must shift towards electronic services, which are currently known as cyber notaries. In Article 1 paragraph (13) of Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary Public, it is explained that the Notary Protocol is one of the state archives, therefore the notary protocol must be treated like a state document kept and kept authentic. Therefore, the notary protocol must always be stored and maintained under any circumstances even if the notary who has the protocol is taking leave or has passed away. Because the Notary Protocol is categorized as a State Archive, the archive is also indirectly subject to Law Number 43 of 2009 concerning Archives. The Archives Act recognizes the existence of electronic archives. Blockchain technology offers a way to do digital archiving that is decentralized.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anand, Ghansham. Karakteristik Jabatan Notaris Di Indonesia. Surabaya: Zifatama Publisher, 2014.

Darus, Luthfan Hadi. Hukum Notariat Dan Tanggung Jawab Jabatan Notaris. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2017.

Kumalawati, Ivo Dewi, Herowati Poesoko, and Ivida Dewi Amrih Suci. Hukum Kenotariatan: Karakteristik Minuta Akta Notaris Sebagai Arsip Negara. Yogyakarta: Laksbang Pustaka, 2021.

Kusumawardani, Qurani Dewi. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pengguna Internet Terhadap Konten Web Umpan Klik Di Media Online.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 19, no. 1 (2019): 11–30. doi:10.30641/dejure.2019.V19.11-30.

Laurensius, Arliman S. Notaris Dan Penegakan Hukum Oleh Hakim. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2015.

Lin, Iuon-Chang, and Tzu-Chun Liao. “A Survey of Blockchain Security Issues and Challenges.” International Journal of Network Security: A Survey of Blockchain Security Issues and Challenges 19, no. 5 (2017): 653–59. doi:10.6633/IJNS.201709.19.

Makarim, Edmon. Notaris Dan Transaksi Elektronik, Kajian Hukum Tentang Cybernotary Atau Electronic Notary. 3rd–4th ed. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2021.

Misranto, Misranto, and Sony Nurul Akhmad. “Kekuatan Akta Autentik Yang Dibuat Oleh Notaris Untuk Pembuktian Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Kenotariatan 3, no. 1 (2019): 84–99.

Prabu, Nurul Muna Zahra, Endang Purwaningsih, and Chandra Yusuf. “Problematika Penerapan Cyber Notary Dikaitkan Dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris.” Jurnal Surya Kecana Dua: Dinamika Masalah Hukum Dan Keadilan 6 (2019): 886–87. doi:10.32493/SKD.v6i2.y2019.3995.

Pratama, I Putu Agus Eka. E-Commerce, E-Business Dan Mobile Commerce. Bandung: Informatika, 2015.

Putri, Cyndiarnis Cahyaning, and Abdul Rachmad Budiono. “Konseptualisasi Dan Peluang Cyber Notary Dalam Hukum.” Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan 4, no. 1 (2019): 29–36. doi:10.17977/um019v4i1p29-36.

Rizqi, Fadhila, and Siti Nurul Intan Sari. “Implementasi Cyber Notary Di Indonesia Ditinjau Dalam Upaya Reformasi Birokrasi Era 4.0.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Kenotariatan 5, no. 1 (2021): 37–51. doi:10.33474/hukeno.v5i1.9391.

Sjaifurrachman, and Habib Adjie. Aspek Pertanggung Jawaban Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2011.

Syamsir, Syamsir, and Yetniwati Yetniwati. “Prospek Cyber Notary Sebagai Media Penyimpanan Pendukung Menuju Profesionalisme Notaris.” Recital Review 1, no. 2 (2019): 132–46.

Toruan, Henry Donald Lbn, Ahyar, Donny Michael, Mosgan Situmorang, Arief Rianto Kurniawan, and Hilmi Ardani Nasution. Efektivitas Majelis Pengawas Notaris. 1st ed. Jakarta: Balitbangkumham Press, 2019.

Wahyuni, Andi Suci. “Urgensi Kebutuhan Akta Autentik Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dan Dinamika Masyarakat 18, no. 1 (2020): 1–18. doi:10.56444/hdm.v18i1.1748.

Wiradiredja, Hilda Sophia. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Yang Didasarkan Pada Keterangan Palsu Dihubungkan Dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris Jo Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Dan KUHP.” Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika 32, no. 1 (2015): 58–81. doi:10.25072/jwy.v32i1.90.

Downloads

Published

03-06-2024

How to Cite

Widya Kridawidyani, Yuni Priskila Ginting, and Fajar Sugianto. 2024. “The Legal Advantages of Blockchain Technology For Notary Protocol Archives”. Mulawarman Law Review 8 (2): 29-42. https://doi.org/10.30872/mulrev.v8i2.1049.