Rekontruksi Ambang Batas Parlemen dalam Sistem Pemilu Indonesia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 116/PUU-XXI/2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30872/risalah.V21.i1.1701Keywords:
Parliamentary Threshold, Constitutional Court Decision No. 116/PUU-XXI/2023, Election System.Abstract
The Constitutional Court (MK) Decision Number 116/PUU-XXI/2023 is an important basis for evaluating the parliamentary threshold policy in the Indonesian election system. This provision requires political parties to obtain a minimum of 4% of valid national votes in order to get seats in the People's Representative Council (DPR). Although it aims to coordinate the party system and increase government stability, this regulation raises various problems, especially related to political representation and electoral justice. The Constitutional Court, in its decision, stated that the parliamentary threshold remains in effect for the 2024 Election but must be evaluated before the 2029 Election so that it is more proportional and does not harm the constitutional rights of voters. This study uses a normative legal method with a regulatory and contextual approach. The results of the study show that the application of the 4% threshold resulted in the loss of around 17.3 million votes in the 2024 Election, which has an impact on limited political representation for small parties and their voters. The Constitutional Court, in its decision, emphasized the need to revise this regulation to be fairer and reflect the principle of people's sovereignty. Some proposed policy alternatives include the implementation of a height threshold, a proportionality-based calculation model, and a revision of the DPR seat allocation system to reduce wasted votes. The parliamentary threshold system needs to be improved with a more objective data-based approach to reflect the principles of electoral fairness better. The evaluation of this rule is a step to realize a more representative, transparent, and democratic electoral system for the future of Indonesian politics
References
(Perludem), Perkumpulan untuk Pemilu dan Demokrasi, ‘Kertas Kebijakan Sistem Pemilu Campuran: Alternatif Desain Sistem Pemilu Indonesia’, Perludem, 2024
(Perludem), Perkumpulan Untuk Pemilu dan Demokrasi, Konversi Suara Menjadi Kursi, Perludem, 2018
Abadi, Songga Aurora, ‘Mekanisme Penetapan Ambang Batas (Threshold) Terhadap Stabilitas Sistem Presidensial Dan Sistem Multipartai Sederhana Di Indonesia’, Jurnal Konstitusi Dan Demokrasi, 2.1 (2022), 10–35 <https://doi.org/10.7454/jkd.v2i1.1202>
Aminah, Siti, Halida Zia, Cindy Oeliga Yensi Afita, and Yohanes Sitorus, ‘Pengaturan Ambang Batas Perolehan Suara (Parliementary Treshold) Dalam Pemilu’, Datin Law Jurnal, 4.3 (2020), 538–46
Anggraini, Novia Salfat, ‘Eksistensi Parliamentary Treshold Dalam Sistem Pemilu Di Indonesia’, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram, 2021, 6
Ansari, Ahmad Nur, Suhardiman Syamsu, and Dian Ekawaty, ‘Relevansi Parliamentary Threshold Dan Sistem Kepartaian Di Indonesia’, Palita: Journal of Social Religion Research, 7.1 (2022), 81–96 <https://doi.org/10.24256/pal.v7i1.2851>
Barqi, Suha Yusbairoh, M. Yasin al Arif, and Irwantoni, ‘Reforming the Parliamentary Threshold in Indonesia’s General Elections : A Legal and Fiqh Siyasah Dusturiyah Perspective’, As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law, 4.2 (2024)
Diamantina, Amalia, Lita Wardhani, Diastama Ramadhan, and Sandra Yakub, ‘Elimination of Parliamentary Threshold and Efforts of Democratization in Parliament’, ICOLEG, 7, 2021 <https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.29-6-2021.2312591>
Fadli, Moh., Fitriani Ahla Sjarif, Aan Eko Widiarto, and Rudy, Monografi Dekonstruksi Perundang-Undangan Indonesia : Menggapai Cita-Cita Ideal Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya, 2022
Fratiwi, Andi, ‘Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 116/PUU-XXI/2023 Tentang Ambang Batas Parlemen Sebagai Landmark Decisions’ (Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah, 2024)
Hafiez, Fachri Audhia, ‘KPU Disebut Tak Bisa Berbuat Apa-Apa Terkait 17,3 Juta Suara Yang Terbuang’, Metro TV News, 2024 <https://www.metrotvnews.com/read/N9nCn2d4-kpu-disebut-tak-bisa-berbuat-apa-apa-terkait-17-3-juta-suara-yang-terbuang> [accessed 8 March 2025]
Hasibuan, SD. Fuji Lestari, and Yonnawati, ‘Pemberlakuan Parliamentary Threshold Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemilihan Umum’, Jurnal Pro Justitia (JPJ), 1.1 (2020), 1–10 <https://doi.org/10.57084/jpj.v1i1.246>
Hastiti, Dayandini, and Edi Sofwan, ‘Parliamentary Threshold and the Future of Multipartyism in Indonesia: Analysis of Constitutional Court Decision Number 116/PUU-XXI/2023’, Majalah Hukum Nasional, 54.2 (2024)
Ilyas, Abdullah, Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Reviva Cendekia, 2023, XXI <https://perpustakaan.umegabuana.ac.id/index.php?p=fstream-pdf&fid=155&bid=2089>
Indianto, Teddy Irawan, ‘Target PKB Sapu Bersih Kemerangan Di Pilkada Serentak 2024’, PPID Sekretariat DPRD Provinsi Jawa Timur, 2024 <https://ppid.dprd.jatimprov.go.id/berita/target-pkb-sapu-bersih-kemerangan-di-pilkada-serentak-2024-65fa8f1b77da8> [accessed 17 March 2025]
Indonesia, Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik, Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 116/PUU-XXI/2023, 2023
International Foundation for Electoral Systems, Elections in Indonesia 2024 General Elections Frequently Asked Questions, 2024
Iskana, Febrika Ratna, ‘Tumpahan Minyak Blok ONWJ Di Karawang Capai 3.000 Barel per Hari - Berita Katadata.Co.Id’, 2019
Kusuma, Dzakwan Fadhil Putra, Muhammad Zidan Masykur, Muh. Rakhul Rahman, and Nurlaili Rahmawati, ‘Penghapusan Ambang Batas Parlemen: Analisis Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Perspektif Hukum Tata Negara’, Palangka Law Review, 02.02 (2022), 27–45
Maharani, Adna Maurilla, and Gayatri Dyah Suprobowati, ‘Mahkamah Konstitusi : Tinjauan Kewenangan Dan Fungsi Dalam Negara Hukum Demokratis Berdasarkan UUD 1945’, Souvereignty : Jurnal Demokrasi Dan Ketahanan Nasional, 1.4 (2022), 714–23
Meyer, Buffy Marie, ‘Quantitative Oil Source-Fingerprinting Techniques and Their Application to Differentiating Crude Oil in Coastal Marsh Sediments’ (Louisiana State University, 2016)
Moeljatno, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana (Jakarta: Refika Aditama, 2002)
Mu’min, Muhammad Saeful, and Sanusi, ‘Implikasi Ambang Batas Parliamentary Threshold Terhadap Kursi Parlemen’, Hukum Responsif, 11.1 (2020), 12–23 <https://doi.org/10.33603/responsif.v11i1.5020>
Mursalin, I Wayan Nurjaya, and Hefni Effendi, ‘Analisis Sensitivitas Lingkungan Oscp (Oil Spill Contingency Plan) Di Pesisir Selatan Delta Mahakam, Provinsi Kalimantan Timur’, Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental Management, 4.1 (2014)
Paryati, Andi Niniek, Sukri, and Ariana, ‘Political Capacity Development of Nasdem Party Women Legislator Candidates in the 2019 Legislative Election in South Sulawesi’, Awang Long Law Review, 4.1 (2021), 134–41
Prayugo, Arlis, ‘Optimalisasi Sistem Proporsional Terbuka Melalui Perubahan Parlemen Threshold’, Journal of Administration, Governance, and Political Issues, 2.1 (2025), 1–16
Rahman, Faiz, ‘Anomali Penerapan Klausul Bersyarat Dalam Putusan Pengujian Undang-Undang Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar’, Jurnal Konstitusi, 17.1 (2020), 027 <https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1712>
Salabi, Amalia, ‘Sistem Pemilu Usulan PDIP Dan Golkar’, Rumahpemilu.Org, 2021 <https://rumahpemilu.org/sistem-pemilu-usulan-pdip-dan-golkar/> [accessed 8 March 2025]
Sitabuana, Tundjung Herning, Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia (Jakarta: Konstitusi Press (Konpress), 2020)
Supriyanto, Didik, and August Mellaz, ‘Ambang Batas Perwakilan: Pengaruh Parliamentary Threshold Terhadap Penyederhanaan Sistem Kepartaian Dan Proporsionalitas Hasil Pemilu’, Perludem, 2011
Syaputra, Muhammad Adi Yusrizal, ‘Koalisi Partai Politik Di Kabinet: Antara Penguatan Lembaga Kepresidenan Atau Politik Balas Budi’, Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), 9.1 (2020), 111 <https://doi.org/10.24843/jmhu.2020.v09.i01.p08>
Taagepera, Rein, ‘Nationwide Threshold of Representation’, Electoral Studies, 21.3 (2002), 383–401 <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(00)00045-7>
Talaba, R Y, ‘Kebijakan Afirmasi: Hambatan Pengoperasian Variabel Teknis Pemilu Terhadap Keterwakilan Perempuan Di DPR’, Jurnal Reinventing, 6.1 (2024), 165–76 <https://jurnal.fisip.untad.ac.id/index.php/reinventing/article/view/1410%0Ahttps://jurnal.fisip.untad.ac.id/index.php/reinventing/article/download/1410/432>
Taufiqurrohman, Moch. Marsa, ‘Meninjau Penerapan Ambang Batas Pemilihan Pada Sistem Pemilihan Umum Proporsional Di Indonesia’, Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 12.1 (2021), 128–43 <https://doi.org/10.14710/politika.12.1.2021.128-143>
Wahid, Deny Noer, and Catur Wido Haruni, ‘Konstruksi Ideal Sistem Parliamentary Treshold Dalam Perspektif Demokrasi’, Jurnal Hukum Kenegaraan, 1.1 (2023), 1–11
Yani, Ahmad Yani, ‘Application of Parlimentary Treshold to the Sustainability of Political Parties from a Human Rights Perspective’, Jurnal Legisci, 1.3 (2023), 180–87 <https://doi.org/10.62885/legisci.v1i3.145>
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Elva Imeldatur Rohmah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
.png)




