Kewenangan PTUN dalam Memeriksa Surat Presiden tentang RUU Cipta Kerja dan Implikasi Putusannya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30872/risalah.v17i1.516Keywords:
Administratif Court, Authority, Examine, Presidential Letter.Abstract
For the first time, the President's Letter in the formation of law was sued by the Administrative Court. This study is intended to determine the authority of the Administrative Court in examining the President's Letter on the Job Creation Bill. The research method uses a normative juridical method using a law approach and a case approach. Based on the results of the research, it is known that the Administrative Court lacks absolute authority to investigate the Presidential Letter on the Job Creation Bill because the Presidential Letter does not meet the requirements specified in the law to qualify as the object of the TUN dispute, namely the state administrative decision (KTUN)/Beschikking. It can also be seen, that even if the decision of the Administrative Court or the court of appeal and cassation within the framework of Judicial Activism accepts and grants the lawsuit of the President's Letter regarding the Job Creation Bill, the decision cannot have direct implications for the invalidity of the validity/legitimacy of Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation because the cancellation of the validity/legitimacy of a law is not under the authority of the Administrative Court, the PT-TUN includes the Supreme Court, but the authority of the Constitutional Court through material and formal examinations. The Job Creaton Act is still regarded as legal and binding if the Constitutional Court does not invalidate it.
Keywords: Administratif Court; authority; examine; presidential letter.
References
Asshiddiqie, Jimly, Hukum acara pengujian undang-undang (Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI, 2006)
Asshiddiqie, Jimly, dan Ali Safa’at, Teori Hans Kelsen Tentang Hukum (Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2016)
Atmosudirdjo, S Prajudi, Hukum administrasi negara (Ghalia Indonesia, 1981)
Barak, Aharon, The judge In A Democracy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006)
Basah, Sjachran, Eksistensi dan Tolak Ukur Badan Peradilan Administrasi di Indonesia (Bandung: Alumni, 1989)
Indroharto, S H, “Usaha-Usaha memahami Undang-Undang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara” (Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan, 2000)
M. Natsir, Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (Jakarta: Djambatan, 2003)
Manan, Bagir, Teori dan Politik Konstitusi (Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2000)
Manan, Bagir, dan Kuntana Magnar, “Beberapa Masalah Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia” (Bandung: Alumni, 1997)
Setiadi, Wicipto, Hukum Acara Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara: Suatu Pengantar (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 1995)
SF, Marbun, “Peradilan Administrasi dan Upaya Administratif di Indonesia” (Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2003)
Aritonang, Dinoroy Marganda, “Penerapan Sistem Presidensil di Indonesia Pasca Amandemen UUD 1945,” Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 22.2 (2010), 391–407
Asshiddiqie, Jimly, Hukum acara pengujian undang-undang (Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI, 2006)
Asshiddiqie, Jimly, dan Ali Safa’at, Teori Hans Kelsen Tentang Hukum (Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2016)
Atmosudirdjo, S Prajudi, Hukum administrasi negara (Ghalia Indonesia, 1981)
Barak, Aharon, The judge In A Democracy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006)
Basah, Sjachran, Eksistensi dan Tolak Ukur Badan Peradilan Administrasi di Indonesia (Bandung: Alumni, 1989)
Firmansyah, Manda, “6 alasan menggugat Omnibus Law RUU Cipta Kerja ke PTUN” <https://www.alinea.id/nasional/6-alasan-menggugat-omnibus-law-ruu-cipta-kerja-ke-ptun-b1ZMO9tYl> [diakses 16 Juni 2021]
Indroharto, S H, “Usaha-Usaha memahami Undang-Undang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara” (Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan, 2000)
Kelsen, Hans, General Theory of Law and State. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (translation by Anders Wedberg) (Harvard: University Press, 1949)
M. Natsir, Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (Jakarta: Djambatan, 2003)
Manan, Bagir, Teori dan Politik Konstitusi (Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2000)
Manan, Bagir, dan Kuntana Magnar, “Beberapa Masalah Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia” (Bandung: Alumni, 1997)
Marshall, William P, “Conservatives And The Seven Sins Of Judicial Activism,” U. Colo. L. Rev., 73 (2002), 1217
Pattipawae, Dezonda R, “Fungsi Pemeriksaan Dismissal dalam Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara,” Sasi, 20.1 (2015), 37–55
Ridwan, H R, “Beberapa Catatan tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara di Indonesia,” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 9.20 (2002), 68–80
Ridwan HR, “Menyoal Tindakan Pemerintah Sebagai Perluasan Objek Gugatan di PTUN” (Diskusi Publik Komunitas Pemerhati Konstitusi, 2020)
Setiadi, Wicipto, Hukum Acara Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara: Suatu Pengantar (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 1995)
SF, Marbun, “Peradilan Administrasi dan Upaya Administratif di Indonesia” (Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2003)
Siahaan, Maruarar, “Uji Konstitusionalitas Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Negara Kita: Masalah dan Tantangan,” Jurnal Konstitusi, 7.4 (2010), 9–48
Simanjuntak, Enrico, Beberapa Anotasi Terhadap Pergeseran Kompetensi Absolut Peradilan Umum kepada Peradilan Administrasi Pasca Pengesahan UU No. 30 Tahun 2014, Bunga Rampai Peradilan Administrasi Kontemporer (Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2014)
Soekanto, Soerjono, dan Sri Mamudji, Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2001)
Soeprapto, Maria Farida Indrati, Ilmu Perundang-Undangan 1: Jenis, Fungsi, dan Materi Muatan (Yogyakarta: PT Kanisius, 2007)
Yuliani, Andi, “Daya ikat pengundangan peraturan perundang-undangan,” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 14.4 (2018), 429–38
Yusa, I Gede, Hukum tata negara: pasca perubahan UUD NRI 1945 (Setara Press, 2016)
.png)
