Perampasan Aset Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang: Perlindungan Pihak Ketiga Beritikad Baik dalam Perspektif Hukum Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30872/risalah.v21.i2.2008Keywords:
Asset Confiscation , Third Party Acting in Good Faith, Money Laundering.Abstract
Asset forfeiture in money laundering serves as a key tool to disrupt the economic benefits of crime and restore state losses, yet its implementation faces challenges in protecting bona fide third parties. The lack of clear and consistent standards for assessing good faith leads judges to decide case by case, creating legal uncertainty and potential injustice. Normative gaps, including disharmony regarding non-conviction-based forfeiture, exacerbate these ambiguities. This study employs a normative juridical method combining statute, case, and conceptual approaches. The statute approach examines the TPPU Law and the Corruption Eradication Law on asset forfeiture and third-party protection; the case approach analyzes judicial practice, including Decision No. 362/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Jkt.Sel, to assess judges’ interpretation of good faith; the conceptual approach reviews doctrines, principles, and theories on asset forfeiture, property rights, and third-party protection. Findings show that judicial standards remain inconsistent, leaving third-party protection case-specific and legally uncertain. The study highlights the gap between normative frameworks and practice and underscores the urgent need for clearer, proportional standards for proving good faith in the anti-money laundering regime.References
Abdullah, Zulfirman, Marsudin Nainggolan, Mohamad Ismed, Prodi Magister, Riwayat Artikel, Kata Kunci, and others, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Perampasan Aset Pihak Ketiga Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang’, Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmiah, 2.2 (2025), 299–311 <https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62335/cendekia.v2i2.969>
Dody Wijaya, Ari, ‘Kebijakan Formulasi Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Pada Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi’, Lex LATA, 3.1 (2022), 47–67 <https://doi.org/10.28946/lexl.v3i1.685>
Fajaryanto, Ahmad Syahrial, M Syahrul Borman, Siti Marwiyah, and Noenik Soekorini, ‘Sistem Pembuktian Terbalik Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang’, Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge, 5.2 (2025), 1145–56 <https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53625/jirk.v5i2.10590>
Fuadi, Gumilang, Windy Virdinia Putri, and Trisno Raharjo, ‘Tinjauan Perampasan Aset Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Dari Perspektif Keadilan’, Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan, 5.1 (2024), 53–68 <https://doi.org/10.18196/jphk.v5i1.19163>
Hafsah, Suci Fitriani, ‘Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Pengaturan Perampasan Aset Sebagai Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian Negara’, Journal Iuris Scientia, 3.1 (2025), 1–16 <https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62263/jis.v3i1.53>
Illahi, Beni Kurnia, and Muhammad Ikhsan Alia, ‘Pengaturan Perampasan Harta Kekayaan Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Di Indonesia’, University Of Bengkulu Law Journal, 2.2 (2019), 185–207 <https://doi.org/10.33369/ubelaj.2.2.185-207>
Kariana, I Made Gede, ‘Penjatuhan Pidana Nihil Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dan Pencucian Uang’, Lex LATA, 6.2 (2024), 141–59 <https://doi.org/10.28946/lexl.v6i2.3193>
Ketaren, Shalsali Amelia, ‘Upaya Kasasi Yang Diajukan Pihak Ketiga Yang Berkepentingan Terhadap Keberatan Atas Putusan Pengadilan Berkaitan Penyitaan Barang Bukti Dari Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 576 K/Pid.Sus/2017)’, Jurnal Darma Agung, 33.1 (2025), 136–45 <https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.46930/ojsuda.v33i1.5372>
Laporan Semester I PPATK Tahun 2025 (Jakarta, 2025)
Novariza, M Nur Sholikin, Sutarno Bintoro, Amarillys Enika Noora Ariesiyani, Muhammad Kharisma Gumilang, Muhammad Faiz Aziz, and others, Pedoman Penanganan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Dan Pemulihan Aset Di Pasar Modal (Jakarta: Perpustakaan Nasional RI, 2018)
Pahlevi, Agung Fuad, and Fabrian, ‘Peratanggungjawaban Hukum Keuchik Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Analisis Kerugian Keuangan Negara’, 7.1 (2025), 1–13 <https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.28946/lexl.v7i1.3340>
Rezky Siregar, Muhammad, and Ilmu Hukum, ‘Kepastian Hukum Pidana Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Melalui Perampasan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Dikuasai Pihak Ketiga’, Butetin Konstitusi, 4.2 (2023) <https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30596/konstitusi.v4i2.17728>
S, Dr. Supardi, Perampasan Harta Korupsi (Kencana, 2020)
Susetyo, Mariano Adhyka, and Supanto Supanto, ‘Perampasan Aset Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Hasil Korupsi’, Recidive : Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan, 12.1 (2023), 80 <https://doi.org/10.20961/recidive.v12i1.69266>
Tantimin, Tantimin, ‘Penyitaan Hasil Korupsi Melalui Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture Sebagai Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian Negara’, Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 5.1 (2023), 85–102 <https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v5i1.85-102>
Tute, Cahyani, ‘Optimization of Asset Confiscation in Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering’, Journal of Law Science, 7.2 (2025), 244–52 <https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35335/jls.v7i2.5820>
Wardhana, Wisjnu, Edi Yunara, and Mahmud Mulyadi, ‘Pengembalian Barang Bukti Kepada Yang Berhak Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi’, Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 2.9 (2023), 769–88 <https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56128/ljoalr.v2i9.231>
Yoserwan, Yoserwan, and Fausto Soares Dias, ‘Implementing The Anti-Money Laundering Law: Optimizing Asset Recovery in Corruption Cases in Indonesia’, Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 13.2 (2024), 227 <https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.13.2.2024.227-250>
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Beniharmoni Harefa, Supardi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
.png)
