Perbandingan Konstitusional Pengaturan Impeachment Presiden Antara Indonesia Dengan Jerman
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30872/risalah.v18i2.600Keywords:
president impeacvhment, constitutional law, comparative lawAbstract
The impeachment system in Germany is implemented slightly differently from that applied in Indonesia. The impeachment system in Germany is executed by the Constitutional Court whose decision is final, which means that it does not receive a 2/3 proposal from the Bundestag and the Bundestraat regarding the dismissal of the President and Vice President as in Indonesia. The regulation of the impeachment system in a country needs to be studied by involving a comparison country to find out whether the impeachment system in a country runs optimally and ideally. Comparison of Impeachment between Indonesia and Germany, The mechanism for dismissing the president as regulated in the constitution is an affirmation that the Republic of Indonesia is a state of law, this is a step forward in a constitutional perspective so that impeachment of the president based on non-juridical factors alone does not happen again in the future. dismissal of the president as regulated in the 1945 Constitution, because in the impeachment mechanism, the decision of the Constitutional Court confirming the opinion of the DPR is not binding.
Keywords: president impeachment; constitutional law; comparative law.
References
Aritonang, Dinoroy Marganda, “Penerapan Sistem Presidensil di Indonesia Pasca Amandemen UUD 1945,” Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 22.2 (2010), 391–407
Hadi, Syofyan, “Impeachment Presiden Dan /Atau Wakil presiden (Studi Perbandingan Antara Indonesia, Amerika Serikat, Dan Filipina),” DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 12.23 (2016), 1–15
Hufron, Hufron, “Perbuatan Tercela Sebagai Alasan Pemakzulan Presiden Dan/atau Wakil Presiden,” Dih: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 12.23, 240034
Hutagalung, Daniel, “Menapaki Jejak-Jejak Pemikiran Soepomo Mengenai Negara Indonesia,” Jurnal Hukum Jentera, 3.10 (2005), 1–18
Misranto, Misranto, “Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Konstruksi Sistem Peradilan Impeachment,” Perspektif, 19.3 (2014), 153–65
Munir, Fuady, Teori Negara Hukum modern (Bandung: Cetakan Pertama, PT. Refika Aditama, 2009)
Nurhardianto, Fajar, “Sistem Hukum dan Posisi Hukum Indonesia,” Jurnal Tapis: Jurnal Teropong Aspirasi Politik Islam, 11.1 (2015), 33–44
Partamayasa, Yoga, “Kewenangan Impeachment Oleh DPRD Terhadap Kepala Daerah,” Jurnal Yustika: Media Hukum Dan Keadilan, 23.01 (2020), 49–66
Siregar, Lisdhani Hamdan, “Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pemakzulan Presiden Dan/Atau Wakil Presiden di Indonesia,” Jurnal Konstitusi, 9.2 (2016), 287–312
Sulistiani, Anggun, “Impeachment President (Studi Perbandingan Ketatanegaraan Indonesia dan Ketatanegaraan Islam,” Jurnal Al-Dustur, 1.1 (2019)
Sulistyoko, Arie, Dosen Tetap Jurusan Hukum Tata Negara, dan Ekonomi Islam IAIN Antasari, “Pemakzulan Presiden dalam Persepsi Konstitusi (Studi Kasus Presiden Abdurrahman Wahid),” Syariah, 16.1 (2016), 47–75
Thalib, Abdul Rasyid, dan M SH, Wewenang Mahkamah Konstitusi & Implikasinya dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan RI (Citra Aditya Bakti, 2006)
Ulum, Muhammad Bahrul, “Mekanisme Pemakzulan Presiden Dan/Atau Wakil Presiden Menurut UUD 1945 (Antara Realitas Politik dan Penegakan Konstitusi),” Jurnal Konstitusi, 7.4 (2016), 131–58
Wastia, Ryan Muthiara, “Mekanisme Impeachment Di Negara Dengan Sistem Presidensial : Studi Perbandingan Mekanisme Impeachment Di Indonesia dan Korea Selatan,” Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 31.2, 237–51
Zoelva, Hamdan, Pemakzulan Presiden Di Indonesia (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2011)
.png)
