Perbedaan Penerapan Pendekaran Per se Illegal dan Rule of Reason dalam Putusan KPPU tentang Kartel Penetapan Harga
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30872/risalah.v18i1.753Keywords:
per se illegal, rule of reason, price fixing cartelAbstract
The emergence of an economic impact analysis in the decision of the price fixing cartel case in Article 5 of the UULPM which should use the approach in that article is Per se Illegal, including Decision No. 08/KPPU-L/2018, Decision No. 04/KPPI-I/2016, Decision No. 32/KPPU-L/2008, Decision No. 26/KPPU-L/2007, and Decision No. 02/KPPU-I/2003 by analyzing the use of a single Per se Illegal approach in the decision of the price fixing cartel case in ensuring legal certainty. The approach in this study uses doctrinal research. From the results of the analysis of the decision related to the price fixing cartel in the consideration of the commission assembly, it has been found in the form of economic evidence/economic analysis which is a characteristic of the Rule of Reason approach to the reasons for the emergence of the economic analysis not being explained explicitly and clearly by the commission assembly, regarding the assessment that can be made. carried out by the KPPU regarding the agreement in Article 5 of the UULPM, economic evidence may appear if the requirement to prove the agreement is difficult to find. Legal considerations using the Per se Illegal approach as the sole approach in the KPPU's decision related to price fixing cartels in ensuring legal certainty, this has been in line with what is positively regulated in Article 5 of the UULPM wherein the provision contains the phrase "prohibited" on behavior and the resulting impact. must be wrong or illegal so that it does not need further analysis.
Keywords: per se illegal; rule of reason; price fixing cartel
References
Anggraini, Tri Maria Anna, “Penggunaan Bukti Ekonomi Dalam Kartel Berdasarkan Hukum Persaingan Usaha,” Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS, 3. 3 (2013).
Anggraini, A.M. Tri, ”Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Tidak Sehat : Per se Illegal atau Rules of Reason,” Jakarta: FH-UI, (2003).
Catatan Seputar Hukum Persaingan Usaha Tersedia: https://business-law.binus.ac.id/2013/01/20/catatan-seputar-hukum-persaingan-usaha/, [diakses 20 Januari 2022].
Damaryanti, Henny, at all, “Penerapan Pendekatan Pendekatan Per se Illegal Dalam Pemeriksaan Kasus Penetapan Harga Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat (Studi Kasus Putusan KPPU RI No. 14/KPPU-I/2014)” Dosen Fakultas Hukum Universitas Panca Bhakti Pontianak, 4. 1 (2017).
Fajari, R.A. dan Afriana, Anita, “Penggunaan Economic Evidence Sebagai Alat Bukti Oleh Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha,” Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 2. 2 (2018).
Huda, Miftahul, “Hak Atas Memperoleh Kepastian Hukum Dalam Perspektif Persaingan Usaha Melalui Telaah Bukti Tidak Langsung (The Right Obtain A Legal Certainty in Business Competition, in Perspective Through the Circumstantial Evidence).” Jurnal HAM, 11. 2 (2020).
Julyano, Mario dan Sulistyawan, Y.A, “Pemahaman Terhadap Asas Kepastian Hukum Melalui Konstruksi Penalaran Positivisme Hukum”. Jurnal Crepido, 1.1 (2019).
Ketahui Syarat menjadi Penyelidik KPPU Tersedia”: Ketahui Syarat Menjadi Penyelidik KPPU Berikut Ini! (hukumonline.com)
<https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/ketahui-syarat-menjadi-penyelidik-kppu-berikut-ini-lt60cb062c7da87> [diakses 20 Januari 2022]
Lubis, Fahmi Andi., dkk, Hukum Persaingan Usaha. (Jakarta: Komisi Persaingan Usaha (KPPU), 2017).
Marzuki, Mahmud Peter, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2008).
Mulyadi, Dudung dan Rusydi, Ibdu, “Efektivitas Peran Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) Dalam Penanganan Kasus Persaingan Usaha Tidak sehat”, 5 (2017).
Nugroho, Adi. S, Hukum Persaingan Usaha Di Indonesia Dalam Teori Dan Praktek Serta Penerapan Hukumnya, (Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2018).
Primandhika, Prasasta Made, “Analisis Penerapan Pendekatan Rule Of Reason dan Per Se Illegal Terhadap Kasus Kartel Di Indonesia” Denpasar: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana, (2019).
Putusan KPPU Tersedia: http://putusan.kppu.go.id/simper/menu/>, [diakses 27 Agustus 2021].
Rokan, Kamal Mustafa, Hukum Persaingan Usaha Teori dan Prakteknya di Indonesia, (Jakarta: rajawali Pers, 2012).
Sulitnya Membuktikan Kartel Tersedia: https://kppu.go.id/blog/2010/07/sulitnya-membuktikan-praktik-kartel/, [diakses 01 Februari 2022].
Yudiansyah, Berli, ”Fungsi Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Dan Larangan Praktek Monopoli,” Indonesian Private Law Review, 1 (2020).
.png)
